Across 5 usable pairs covering 5 assets.
Risk and health
Risk scoreNot ratedHigher means more pressure.
Health score19.8/100Higher means stronger trading conditions.
Market strain; buy–sell gap 0.29%
Market evidence: 2026-09-08. Scores calculated: 2026-09-15. Evidence confidence: 25/100. These indices do not measure the probability of failure or prove solvency.
Purcow
Shows Purcow trading, money movements and published company records.
Beyond the ten busiest pairs
See whether the quieter trading pairs still have orders behind their prices.
The measured slice has ten pairs or fewer, so there is no remaining group to compare.
How much can this reading tell us?
Confidence in the evidence available for this page. It is not a safety rating or a chance of survival.
Data coverage · Tier 3 · 8 of 20 core questions have evidence (40%). This tier measures available information, not exchange health. Some evidence is partial or historical.
25/100
Evidence confidence
Evidence confidence
Where the evidence is strongest
Coverage is limited to 20 core questions. It does not cover every exchange risk, wallet behaviour or trading-quality check.
Reported trading and money near the price
the price
$1.3m
$25k resting1.8% of a day's trading
Orders near the price total $25k, equal to 1.8% of reported daily trading.
Orange is reported 24-hour volume. The blue band is quoted depth within 2% of the price, estimated across both directions and drawn at the same scale. Of what Purcow reported, 99% was measurable here across its busiest 5 pairs.
What this venue carries.
Reported 24-hour volume, quoted depth near the price, and the ratio between them.
Estimated across both directions. Depth rank 115 of 122 on the board.
Rank 6 of 122. The typical venue reports 3.8x.
Charlie's inferencePurcow does not show that split today. Its quote and its book point the same way. Its average spread is 0.294%, which ranks 102 of 122 from tightest. A tight quote is a price gap. The book shows how much was posted near it at the read.
The broad view, with every part left visible.
The profile joins five market readings. All five must be available for the same comparison group. It does not include liabilities, customer assets or withdrawal completion, so it is not a safety score.
Several measured market readings are strained
All trading is valued in Bitcoin. The latest seven-day average is compared with the previous seven days. The change can differ from trading measured in dollars.
The latest seven-day average is compared with a matching seven-day average thirty days earlier. Volumes are valued in Bitcoin.
$1.0m, or 76% of measured venue trading.
Against venues its own size.
Comparing a small venue with the largest tells you little. These are the exchanges nearest to it in reported volume, from $781k to $1.4m, and their volume-to-depth ratios.
Charlie's inferenceThe middle of this size band reports 0.6x volume-to-depth. That is the closer comparison, not the full-market average.
What it leans on.
Concentration, one-sidedness and how much survives once the two legs everything trades against are removed.
76% of its trading. Its top three pairs are 97%.
Zero would mean buying and selling cost the same. Higher means the book supports one direction more than the other.
Of its trading survives that removal, and 0% of its depth.
What has been reported.
Recent stories about Purcow. A headline can raise a useful question; the figures elsewhere on this page help check it.
Nothing naming this exchange came up in the last three weeks. Quiet is not the same as clear.
What it publishes, and what this page will not say.
This is a search state, not evidence about how much the venue holds or owes.
Listed pairs marked stale or odd, removed before any figure here.
Nothing on this page describes what this company owes or holds for customers. Order-book data cannot answer that.
A closer look at Purcow.
Open a group for company records, operating details and the gaps that still matter.
What supports this company view
Available evidenceTrading size, Depth, Price gap, Book balance, Largest pair, Bitcoin share, Market breadth, Pair coverage8 of 20 questions
Customer balances and company debtsFull company liabilities have not been established.Read the scope
Questions still openSeven-day history, Thirty-day history, Tracked assets, One-day flow, Seven-day flow, Thirty-day flow, Direct reserve material, Disclosure frequency, Customer balance scope, Dated per-asset reserve ratios, Measured withdrawal completion, Measured service interruptionsExcluded from conclusions
What could change the reading?A deeper book can disappear; transfers can be custody changes; a reserve report covers its stated date and scope. Repeated measurements and matched company reports strengthen the evidence.Follow the change