Identified wallets only. Customer debts are not included.
Risk and health
Market strain; buy–sell gap 0.02%; 7-day trading change +0.6%
Market evidence: 2026-09-08. Scores calculated: 2026-09-15. Evidence confidence: 52/100. These indices do not measure the probability of failure or prove solvency.
Niza
Shows Niza trading, money movements and published company records.
Beyond the ten busiest pairs
See whether the quieter trading pairs still have orders behind their prices.
These are the covered pairs, not every listed coin. Less traded here does not mean a small market cap. Visible orders can change; they do not guarantee the price of a trade.
How much can this reading tell us?
Confidence in the evidence available for this page. It is not a safety rating or a chance of survival.
Data coverage · Tier 2 · 13 of 20 core questions have evidence (65%). This tier measures available information, not exchange health. Some evidence is partial or historical.
Evidence confidence
Where the evidence is strongest
Coverage is limited to 20 core questions. It does not cover every exchange risk, wallet behaviour or trading-quality check.
Money held, money moving.
Inflow minus outflow in the tracked wallet set.
Transfers can include custody changes as well as customer activity.
Over seven days, net transfers of $0.00 entered the tracked wallets. That is 0.0% of the assets currently visible. This is movement in a labelled wallet set, not a count of customer withdrawals.
These windows overlap. Their bars show direction and size; they should not be added together.
Orange is reported 24-hour volume. The blue band is quoted depth within 2% of the price, estimated across both directions and drawn at the same scale. Of what Niza reported, 100% was measurable here across its busiest 224 pairs.
What this venue carries.
Reported 24-hour volume, quoted depth near the price, and the ratio between them.
Across 224 usable pairs covering 104 assets.
Estimated across both directions. Depth rank 40 of 122 on the board.
Rank 48 of 122. The typical venue reports 3.8x.
The broad view, with every part left visible.
The profile joins five market readings. All five must be available for the same comparison group. It does not include liabilities, customer assets or withdrawal completion, so it is not a safety score.
Mixed market readings
All trading is valued in Bitcoin. The latest seven-day average is compared with the previous seven days. The change can differ from trading measured in dollars.
The latest seven-day average is compared with a matching seven-day average thirty days earlier. Volumes are valued in Bitcoin.
$55.0m, or 13% of measured venue trading.
Against venues its own size.
Comparing a small venue with the largest tells you little. These are the exchanges nearest to it in reported volume, from $386m to $446m, and their volume-to-depth ratios.
What it leans on.
Concentration, one-sidedness and how much survives once the two legs everything trades against are removed.
13% of its trading. Its top three pairs are 36%.
Zero would mean buying and selling cost the same. Higher means the book supports one direction more than the other.
Of its trading survives that removal, and 53% of its depth.
What has been reported.
Recent stories about Niza. A headline can raise a useful question; the figures elsewhere on this page help check it.
- NIZA to HKD: Convert Niza to Hong Kong Dollar | Live NIZA Price in HKD | MEXCMEXC · 31 Aug 2026
- Niza Global Price Today | Live NIZA Price, Chart & Market DataBinance · 30 Aug 2026
What it publishes, and what this page will not say.
This is a search state, not evidence about how much the venue holds or owes.
Listed pairs marked stale or odd, removed before any figure here.
Nothing on this page describes what this company owes or holds for customers. Order-book data cannot answer that.
A closer look at Niza.
Open a group for company records, operating details and the gaps that still matter.