Identified wallets only. Customer debts are not included.
Risk and health
Risk score42.3/100Higher means more pressure.
Health score73.6/100Higher means stronger trading conditions.
Tracked outflow pressure; buy–sell gap 0.03%; 7-day trading change +4.0%
Market evidence: 2026-09-08. Scores calculated: 2026-09-15. Evidence confidence: 57/100. These indices do not measure the probability of failure or prove solvency.
CEX.IO
Shows CEX.IO trading, money movements and published company records.
Beyond the ten busiest pairs
See whether the quieter trading pairs still have orders behind their prices.
Other measured pairsOutside this venue’s ten busiest measured pairs643
Share of tradingTheir share of the measured 24-hour trading5.08%
Share of nearby ordersTheir share of orders within 2% on both sides59.21%
Typical support for sellingMiddle pair’s visible buy orders within 2% below price$35.28k
Typical support for buyingMiddle pair’s visible sell orders within 2% above price$78.25k
Typical price gapMiddle pair’s gap between the best buy and sell quote0.31%
Less than $10,000 on either side191 of 643 pairs have fewer nearby orders on at least one side29.70%
These are the covered pairs, not every listed coin. Less traded here does not mean a small market cap. Visible orders can change; they do not guarantee the price of a trade.
How much can this reading tell us?
Confidence in the evidence available for this page. It is not a safety rating or a chance of survival.
Data coverage · Tier 2 · 14 of 20 core questions have evidence (70%). This tier measures available information, not exchange health. Some evidence is partial or historical.
57/100
Evidence confidence
Evidence confidence
Where the evidence is strongest
Coverage is limited to 20 core questions. It does not cover every exchange risk, wallet behaviour or trading-quality check.
Money held, money moving.
Inflow minus outflow in the tracked wallet set.
Transfers can include custody changes as well as customer activity.
This window overlaps the seven-day reading; do not add them.
Over seven days, net transfers of $702.28k left the tracked wallets. That is 34.9% of the assets currently visible. This is movement in a labelled wallet set, not a count of customer withdrawals.
Net transfers outNet transfers in
24 hours
−$215.26k
7 days
−$702.28k
30 days
−$3.69m
These windows overlap. Their bars show direction and size; they should not be added together.
Reported trading and money near the price
the price
$52.7m
$634m resting1201.8% of a day's trading
Orders near the price total $634m, equal to 1201.8% of reported daily trading.
Orange is reported 24-hour volume. The blue band is quoted depth within 2% of the price, estimated across both directions and drawn at the same scale. Of what CEX.IO reported, 100% was measurable here across its busiest 653 pairs.
What this venue carries.
Reported 24-hour volume, quoted depth near the price, and the ratio between them.
Across 653 usable pairs covering 269 assets.
Estimated across both directions. Depth rank 5 of 122 on the board.
Rank 113 of 122. The typical venue reports 3.8x.
Charlie's inferenceCEX.IO quotes in the tightest third of this group while its one-sided book says something different. The screen looks better than the book behind it. Its average spread is 0.033%, which ranks 36 of 122 from tightest. A tight quote is a price gap. The book shows how much was posted near it at the read.
The broad view, with every part left visible.
The profile joins five market readings. All five must be available for the same comparison group. It does not include liabilities, customer assets or withdrawal completion, so it is not a safety score.
Mixed market readings
All trading is valued in Bitcoin. The latest seven-day average is compared with the previous seven days. The change can differ from trading measured in dollars.
The latest seven-day average is compared with a matching seven-day average thirty days earlier. Volumes are valued in Bitcoin.
$875k, or 2% of measured venue trading.
Against venues its own size.
Comparing a small venue with the largest tells you little. These are the exchanges nearest to it in reported volume, from $49.5m to $65.0m, and their volume-to-depth ratios.
Charlie's inferenceThe middle of this size band reports 6.0x volume-to-depth. That is the closer comparison, not the full-market average.
What it leans on.
Concentration, one-sidedness and how much survives once the two legs everything trades against are removed.
36% of its trading. Its top three pairs are 63%.
Zero would mean buying and selling cost the same. Higher means the book supports one direction more than the other.
Of its trading survives that removal, and 40% of its depth.
What has been reported.
Recent stories about CEX.IO. A headline can raise a useful question; the figures elsewhere on this page help check it.
Nothing naming this exchange came up in the last three weeks. Quiet is not the same as clear.
What it publishes, and what this page will not say.
This is a search state, not evidence about how much the venue holds or owes.
Listed pairs marked stale or odd, removed before any figure here.
Nothing on this page describes what this company owes or holds for customers. Order-book data cannot answer that.
A closer look at CEX.IO.
Open a group for company records, operating details and the gaps that still matter.
What supports this company view
Available evidenceTrading size, Depth, Price gap, Book balance, Largest pair, Bitcoin share, Market breadth, Pair coverage, Seven-day history, Thirty-day history, Tracked assets, One-day flow, Seven-day flow, Thirty-day flow14 of 20 questions
Customer balances and company debtsFull company liabilities have not been established.Read the scope
Questions still openDirect reserve material, Disclosure frequency, Customer balance scope, Dated per-asset reserve ratios, Measured withdrawal completion, Measured service interruptionsExcluded from conclusions
What could change the reading?A deeper book can disappear; transfers can be custody changes; a reserve report covers its stated date and scope. Repeated measurements and matched company reports strengthen the evidence.Follow the change